—baobaopanda —spenceralthouse —murrays3 —spenceralthouse —shahbanomalik
If you’re curious, David Niven is the only Best Actor winner to be on screen for a shorter length of time, winning the Oscar for appearing in just 23 minutes and 39 seconds in 1958’s Separate Tables. —elinorh —laurengarafano —dominiquen438 —marcsauve —helen1blakee —letoriouslet “Part of the reason her performance is so ridiculously good is because everyone in the movie is singing live (as opposed to lip-synching to a recording that was made in a studio), so she’s in the setting, acting out all the awful things that happened to her. Because of that she emotes in a totally raw way that you just don’t get with pre-recorded tracks.” —promising.young.woman —spenceralthouse —erikd4e —f4bul0u5 —melmel33 —Elena Baldisseri, Facebook —jennr4ab —rachaelcparry and loulabelson —monikap6 There’s an Old Hollywood rumor that Darryl F. Zanuck, the then-head of 20th Century Fox, was so impressed with Ritter while she filmed this movie that he demanded they expand her role into two scenes. Ritter went on to receive six Oscar nominations in just 12 years, becoming one of the most-nominated actors to never win." —spenceralthouse —adamjunrein
—nicholashunter —libby77 Here’s a total breakdown of screen time per movie:
- Sorcerer’s Stone (2001): 4 minutes
- Chamber of Secrets (2002): 4 minutes and 30 seconds
- Prisoner of Azkaban (2004): 5 minutes and 45 seconds
- Goblet of Fire (2005): 4 minutes and 45 seconds
- Order of the Phoenix (2007): 4 minutes
- Half-Blood Prince (2009): 9 minutes and 15 seconds
- Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (2010): 1 minutes and 15 seconds
- Deathly Hallows: Part 2 (2011): 9 minutes and 45 seconds